What’s Up for Equities Down Under?
December 15, 2015

Download PDF

The Australian economy’s reliance on commodities has been challenged in recent years as China’s slowing growth rate has curbed its once-tremendous appetite for products such as iron ore, Australia’s largest export. In response, Australia is working to free itself from dependence on mining and exports of natural resources by shoring up other areas of its economy. Andrew Sisson, managing director and chief investment officer–Australian Equity, Franklin Local Asset Management, discusses Australia’s continuing commodity conundrum and provides an outlook on additional sectors of the economy.

Andrew Sisson

Andrew Sisson

Andrew Sisson
Managing Director, Chief Investment Officer–Australian Equity
Franklin Local Asset Management

We believe the Australian economy will see moderate growth in 2016, but we are keeping our eye on a potential road bump: the risk of a harder landing for the Chinese economy.

The slowdown in Chinese economic growth in the past few years has been an ongoing concern in Australia. China is a primary consumer of Australian commodities, particularly iron ore, the main ingredient needed to manufacture the steel that has been essential to China’s building boom of the last decade or so. Commodities comprise about half of Australia’s exports; iron ore alone makes up 20.2%.1

Recently, however, China’s annual rate of gross domestic product (GDP) growth has slowed from double digits in the early 2000s to less than 7% in 2015,2 and the country’s demand for commodities has declined along with it. In turn, the expectation for a continued slide in Chinese commodity consumption led the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to cut Australia’s 2016 GDP growth rate from 3% to 2.6%.3

If China’s growth rate continues to slow in the year ahead, the Australian economy may experience a corresponding falloff, with the natural resources sector likely to bear the brunt of the decline. While the possibility of a hard landing for China cannot be ruled out, we believe large-capitalisation Australian resource companies may be cushioned by their position as low-cost producers, particularly in iron ore, and by the weakness in the Australian dollar that would likely accompany lower commodity prices.

Australia GDP snip

We anticipate little price recovery in commodity prices in the immediate term. Excess returns in commodity markets in recent years have been removed by price falls in response to waning demand. Meanwhile, supply-side volume adjustments have been limited to date, and have resulted in a build-up in inventory.

At present, we do not see compelling broad-based value opportunities in the Australian resources sector. Where we do see value, our exposures remain scaled to reflect residual commodity price risk. That said, we are finding value in a number of energy, and oil and gas companies following significant share price underperformance.  We are neutrally positioned on mining companies, but do see some selective opportunities. We remain cautious on the price of gold and gold-related equities.

Financials Meeting Regulatory Challenges

Looking to the Australian financial sector, new capital standards that were meant to bolster banks’ balance sheets have required the banking sector to raise money, and share prices are now at levels which appear to represent attractive long-term value. Whilst cyclical and regulatory headwinds for Australian banks exist, their relatively high pre-tax dividend yields, combined with modest earnings growth, have provided attractive total returns.4

Retail banks, which have benefitted from recent mortgage repricing activity, appear to us to be better placed to grow their earnings than more business-oriented or corporate banks. We believe the key risks for the sector relate to the pace of asset-quality deterioration from a multi-paced global economy, global regulatory agendas and the ability to contain costs if revenue growth moderates.

Our analysis reveals that the current return on capital within the life insurance sector is low by historical standards, and the near-term outlook for system growth rates (or total premium written) is subdued. In general, however, life insurance companies have taken actions that should improve returns over the next few years. Regulatory changes are likely to benefit returns in the medium term, although there is the potential for negative outcomes in the short term.

General insurance is volatile by nature, and the near-term outlook for that line of business looks uncertain to us. We think the healthy margins achieved over recent years in personal lines products are likely to move lower. Competition in these segments is intense, with smaller players gaining market share. The outlook for commercial insurance, both domestically and internationally, is also quite challenging with premium rates under pressure.

Within the broader wealth management sector, movements in equity markets will likely have a strong influence on future profitability. The flow of money into wealth products remains quite soft, and with the threat of yet more changes to Australia’s superannuation system—its government-mandated retirement plan—we believe this softness is likely to persist. Regulatory changes, whilst positive in terms of creating a higher-quality, more robust market structure, are introducing higher costs and placing pressure on margins. We currently find it challenging to find valuation appeal in this sector.

Infrastructure Inflated

We also remain concerned with stretched relative valuation metrics in the infrastructure investment space (toll roads, airports, electricity and gas). Whilst we believe the majority of these companies are being managed and operated very effectively, prospective returns appear to have been compressed due to strong share-price outperformance during 2015. We recognise the durability of the expected future cash flows of these businesses in the current economic context; however, share prices reflect a high degree of investor certainty regarding future cash flows that we don’t fully agree with.

Industrials Polarised

Meanwhile, valuations in the industrials sector have become unusually polarised based on a company’s perceived earnings. As a consequence, share prices of highly rated companies will likely be very sensitive to changes in earnings certainty. We would anticipate this polarisation to diminish in the medium to long term if interest rates revert closer to their historical norms.

By contrast, risks are arguably more than priced into some of the more cyclical stocks. Share prices of companies with exposure to the residential housing market appear to be anticipating a sharp reversal of fortunes. The market also appears to be fearing oil price volatility—for both oil consumers and oil producers.

While we monitor the daily vagaries of the market, our approach to investing in Australian equities is based on fundamental value over a medium- to long-term investment horizon. We pay little heed to short-term market noise or forecasts of near- term company earnings. When making investment decisions, our emphasis is on a firm’s business model and long-term earnings and cash-flow sustainability.

To get insights from Franklin Templeton delivered to your inbox, subscribe to the Beyond Bulls & Bears blog.

For timely investing tidbits, follow us on Twitter @FTI_Global and on LinkedIn.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

The comments, opinions and analyses are the personal views expressed by the investment manager and are intended to be for informational purposes and general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. The information provided in this material is rendered as at publication date and may change without notice, and it is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region market or investment.

Data from third-party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton Investments (“FTI”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FTI accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information, and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user. Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered by FTI affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulations permit. Please consult your own professional adviser for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

What Are the Risks?

All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions. To the extent a portfolio focuses on particular countries, regions, industries, sectors or types of investments, from time to time, it may be subject to greater risks of adverse developments in such areas of focus than one that invests in a wider variety of countries, regions, industries, sectors or investments. Special risks are associated with foreign investing, including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments.

 _______________________________________________________

1. Source: Department of Foreign Affairs, based on data obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, June 2015.

2. Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China, press release dated 19 October 2015.

3. Source: Economic Outlook November 2015, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

4. Past performance does not guarantee future results.