The September US monetary policy meeting held few surprises as the Federal Reserve (Fed) continued its path of normalisation, increasing its benchmark rate (the fed funds rate) 25 basis points for the third time this year, to a range of 2% to 2.25%. The Fed also updated its monetary policy and economic forecasts, which reflect a generally positive economic backdrop.
The most media attention seemed to focus on the Fed’s removal of the word “accommodative” in its official statement in regard to its stance on monetary policy. At the post-meeting press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell essentially said that language was no longer needed given the state of the economy and it does not signal any change in terms of the gradual tightening path the Fed has been on.
“Our economy is strong. Growth is running at a healthy clip. Unemployment is low. The number of people working is rising steadily. Inflation is low and stable,” he said, adding “It’s a particularly bright moment for the US economy.”
Looking at the Fed’s forecast and commentary, I wouldn’t read much into the removal of the “accommodative” language in the sense of any change in the trajectory of rate hikes the Fed has outlined going forward. It seems pretty clear they will continue to tighten.
The Fed’s actions and language reflect robust US economic fundamentals. US gross domestic product grew 4%+ (year-over-year) in the second quarter, and growth appears to have continued at a robust pace in the third quarter given employment data and other broad economic indicators.
Given this good fundamental backdrop, we think it’s healthy for the Fed to continue the gradual tightening path it has been laying out for some time now.
Fundamentals Matter More Than Unknowns
The market has taken rising rates in stride and has been able to shake off a number of uncertainties over the past few months, including tariffs, emerging-market volatility and the run-up to US midterm elections in November, which could shift the makeup of Congress.
The market’s behaviour seems to be indicating it cares more about the fundamentals—namely the economy and corporate profits—than these unknowns. To a large degree, the Fed has concurred. While Fed policymakers have discussed these potential risks, they aren’t making any assumptions about them when it comes to their forecasts. Here are the latest projections:
- The Fed raised its 2018 US growth forecast to 3.1% from its prior forecast of 2.8%.
- The 2018 inflation projection (based on Personal Consumption Expenditures) remained at 2.1%, and the longer-term forecast for 2020 also remained at 2.1%.
- The projection for 2018’s unemployment rate edged up slightly to 3.7%, from the prior 3.6%.
- The Fed continues to project a total of four interest-rate hikes in 2018, putting the federal funds rate at 2.4%. It maintained its 2020 projection of 3.4%.
The latest “dot plot” from the Fed is still showing a fairly aggressive tightening path. The market still seems a bit sceptical that interest rates will actually move as high as the Fed has indicated to be its normal or neutral rate of around 3%.
We continue to view the Fed’s normalisation of rates as a positive and the biggest market risks are probably non-fundamental ones. The United States is pretty far into its current economic expansion cycle, and it is prudent to have a lot of ammunition at the end of the cycle to be prepared for the next recession.
The United States has only seen one other cycle as long as 10 years since World War II. With the fed funds rate up at least to its neutral rate, the central bank has more flexibility to stimulate the economy if necessary. In Europe or Japan, policy rates are still at or near negative and they haven’t ended quantitative easing from the last downturn, which is worrisome. While we don’t anticipate an economic downturn in the near-term, we do know that it will happen eventually.
When asked about the impact of recent trade/tariff concerns on the economy, Powell said on aggregate, the impact on the US economy’s performance hasn’t been significant, but loss of business confidence is a worry.
“We have been hearing a rising chorus of concerns from businesses all over the country about disruption in supply chains, materials costs increases and loss of markets….The tariffs might provide a basis for companies to raise prices in a world where they’ve been reluctant.”
Powell also added that they didn’t currently see such price increases showing up in the data.
So, we think the Fed views tariffs as a one-off risk, but there has to be more turmoil to have an impact on the economy. The Fed is making it clear they are aware of the potential impact, but aren’t currently setting policy based on it.
Yield Curve’s Predictive Ability May Not Be So Predictive This Time
There has been a lot of talk this year about the flattening of the yield curve—which is a graphical representation of the difference between short and long-term interest-rate instruments. The yield curve turns negative when yields on short-term Treasury instruments are higher than those of long-term instruments. Historically, that inversion from the normal yield curve, where long-term rates are higher, has been a harbinger of a recession.
While this is something we are watching, in our view, the predictive power of the yield curve may not be as powerful as it has been in the past, because in this era of global quantitative easing, central banks are acting on the markets in an untraditional way. They have been purchasing significant volumes of securities, which has impacted their prices. That means there are non-fundamental forces at work.
Usually, the Fed takes a very long-term view and has been loath to increase its near-term or longer-term inflation projections unless there is a strong reason to do so. As such, we didn’t see the Fed alter its long-term inflation projections from the last meeting. Powell said they didn’t expect inflation to spike.
In our view, the pace of Fed interest-rate hikes has been normal and healthy at this point of the economic cycle. We think the markets should be able to take this policy normalisation in stride.
The comments, opinions and analyses are the personal views expressed by the investment managers and are intended to be for informational purposes and general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. The information provided in this material is rendered as at publication date and may change without notice, and it is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region market or investment.
Data from third-party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton Investments (“FTI”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FTI accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information, and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user. Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered by FTI affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulations permit. Please consult your own professional adviser for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
Get more perspectives from Franklin Templeton Investments delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to the Beyond Bulls & Bears blog.
What Are the Risks?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as prices of bonds in an investment portfolio adjust to a rise in interest rates, the value of the portfolio may decline. Special risks are associated with foreign investing, including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments. Investments in emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with these markets’ smaller size, lesser liquidity and lack of established legal, political, business and social frameworks to support securities markets.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.