The nomination of Christine Lagarde for the role of president of the European Central Bank (ECB) has raised a few eyebrows. But we think that, if ratified, it should prove a popular appointment for markets.
Lagarde, a former French finance minister and currently chair of the International Monetary Fund, has a good profile and crucially, she understands European Union (EU) politics. She’s a strong communicator and as a seasoned politician has a track record of bringing disparate parties together.
In monetary policy terms, we’d expect Lagarde to continue the direction of travel steered by the current incumbent ECB President Mario Draghi.
Like US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Lagarde is not an economist, so if she is confirmed in the post, the heads of two of the world’s largest central banks would have little monetary policy experience.
We don’t see that as a concern. Indeed, without the preconceived notions of an economist, Lagarde may bring some creative new easing ideas.
ECB Likely to Maintain Its Easing Bias
Our analysis suggests that whoever is in charge, the ECB is likely to remain steadfast on its easing path. Draghi’s recent speech at Sintra in Portugal revealed a subtle but important pivot, just weeks after the bank’s June policy meeting.
After the governing council meeting in early June, the central bank said it would respond if economic data got worse. At Sintra, Draghi said it would respond unless data got better.
Essentially, policymakers are admitting the 5-year, 5-year (5yr-5yr) forward inflation index—a measure of the market’s inflation expectation for five years, five years from today—has been declining more rapidly than the governing council members would like.
The index has rebounded a little since the speech, but it’s still at a lower level than when the ECB embarked on quantitative easing (QE) back in March 2015.
In our view, this means the bank has to respond. The ECB is an inflation-targeting central bank. At just 1.6%, the bank’s own inflation forecasts for 2021 are still quite shy of their 2% target. So, it will have to create some more accommodation.
We think there are a number of approaches the ECB could consider:
Cutting interest rates further: We would only expect a small cut, so it would be unlikely to make a difference. But it would show the central bank is serious.
Introduce tiering: If it cuts interest rates, we’d expect the ECB also to introduce tiering—effectively lowering the charges that banks pay on some of their excess cash—to help the banking system. However, the introduction of tiering would signal to the market that rates will likely remain low for an extended period of time. If it were going to cut rates for the short term (with the expectation of hiking them again in six months or a year) it likely wouldn’t go to the bother of introducing tiering.
Restart QE: We think the bank will likely restart its asset-purchase programme this year or next year. We’d expect it to focus on buying assets in both the corporate and government space.
And, of course, if Lagarde is confirmed as the new ECB president, she may bring some more creative easing operations to the table.
The Search for Yield Intensifies
Our conclusion is that whoever inherits the reins of the ECB, interest rates are likely to remain low in Europe for a long time. That intensifies the search for yield, pushing out the yield curve. We’d expect to see yield curves flattening quite considerably across Europe.
This should also likely be very supportive for peripheral bonds because yields can be brought down to a place where they can issue them at quite attractive levels.
At the moment, Italian government bonds are among the highest-yielding assets in the sovereign space in Europe.
Monetary policy in Europe more skewed towards easing should also be positive for the region’s high-yield and investment-grade corporate debt. In addition, we think it could be supportive for global growth because the ECB is creating more liquidity.
The comments, opinions and analyses expressed herein are for informational purposes only and should not be considered individual investment advice or recommendations to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Because market and economic conditions are subject to rapid change, comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of the date of the posting and may change without notice. The material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, market, industry, investment or strategy.
Data from third-party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton Investments (“FTI”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FTI accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user. Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered by FTI affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulations permit. Please consult your own professional adviser for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
To get insights from Franklin Templeton delivered to your inbox, subscribe to the Beyond Bulls & Bears blog.
What Are the Risks?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as prices of bonds in an investment portfolio adjust to a rise in interest rates, the value of the portfolio may decline. Investments in foreign securities involve special risks including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments.