This post is also available in: Spanish
Silicon Valley Bank’s (SVB) collapse sent shockwaves across public and private markets over the weekend, and created a volatile start to the week. How are our investment teams making sense of SVB’s collapse? Monday morning, I sat down with four of our senior investment professionals: Dr. Sonal Desai, Chief Investment Officer, Franklin Templeton Fixed Income, Ryan Brist, Head of Global Investment Grade Credit, Western Asset, James Cross, Co-Head of Venture Capital Investing, Franklin Equity Group, and Dan Nuckles, Research Analyst – Banks and Financials, Franklin Equity Group. We discussed why Silicon Valley Bank is unique, what may have caused the problem and where we see opportunities. For the complete webinar, please click on this link.
Silicon Valley Bank is a unique bank with a classic problem. SVB was focused on startup companies primarily in technology. Startup and venture capital firms held large deposits at SVB that were not guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). SVB served half of all venture-backed companies in the United States.1 SVB failed because of a mismatch between its short-term depositors who were withdrawing assets and its longer-term assets, mostly US Treasures, that had dropped in value as interest rates increased. This bank failed because it did not have a diversified client base and lacked strong risk management, which ultimately ended in a bank run.
Regulators and Washington calmed concerned investors. The stock market movement, especially regional banks, on March 13, 2023, tells us that there are still concerns with people moving their deposits away from smaller banks to larger banks, which could cause additional instability. However, the recent Fed action seems to have calmed some of the initial fears heading into the weekend.
The Federal Reserve (Fed) may have created a bubble. This is a problem of the Fed’s own making by keeping rates very low over an extremely long period of time, leading to a general “asset bubble.”
Overvalued venture companies outlook will return to normalcy. There was a dramatic rise in valuations of enterprise software companies between 2019 and 2021. Valuations are now returning to more reasonable levels which will improve the longer-term outlook for venture returns. In addition, venture investors are now looking beyond firms that produced corporate software to batteries, chemicals, nuclear fusion or clean energy.
While there are still concerns, we see multiple opportunities in the market now. There continue to be opportunities in fixed income—mostly in Treasuries and high-quality corporate debt. In the equity market, there may be opportunities in some financial stocks, but very careful selection is needed.
While we know there will be reverberations and volatility, there are also potential opportunities. Stay tuned for more insights on this evolving situation.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as prices of bonds in an investment portfolio adjust to a rise in interest rates, the value of the portfolio may decline.
Investments in fast-growing industries like the technology sector (which historically has been volatile) could result in increased price fluctuation, especially over the short term, due to the rapid pace of product change and development and changes in government regulation of companies emphasizing scientific or technological advancement or regulatory approval for new drugs and medical instruments. Buying and using blockchain-enabled digital currency carries risks, including the loss of principal. Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio.
IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION
This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.
The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.
Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.
Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
1. Source: Bloomberg. “How Silicon Valley Bank Served the Tech Industry and Beyond.” March 10, 2023.